@@@@@ @   @ @@@@@    @     @ @@@@@@@   @       @  @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@
         @   @   @ @        @ @ @ @    @       @     @   @   @   @   @  @
         @   @@@@@ @@@@     @  @  @    @        @   @    @   @   @   @   @
         @   @   @ @        @     @    @         @ @     @   @   @   @  @
         @   @   @ @@@@@    @     @    @          @      @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@

                        Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
                    Club Notice - 05/25/01 -- Vol. 19, No. 47

       Chair/Librarian: Mark Leeper, 732-817-5619, mleeper@avaya.com
       Factotum: Evelyn Leeper, 732-332-6218, eleeper@lucent.com
       Distinguished Heinlein Apologist: Rob Mitchell, robmitchell@avaya.com
       HO Chair Emeritus: John Jetzt, jetzt@avaya.com
       HO Librarian Emeritus: Nick Sauer, njs@lucent.com
       Back issues at http://www.geocities.com/evelynleeper
       All material copyright by author unless otherwise noted.

       The Science Fiction Association of Bergen County meets on the
       second Saturday of every month in Upper Saddle River; call
       201-447-3652 for details.  The Denver Area Science Fiction
       Association meets 7:30 PM on the third Saturday of every month at
       Southwest State Bank, 1380 S. Federal Blvd.

       ===================================================================

       1. The last of this year's short fiction Hugo nominees has been put
       on-line; here is the complete list of URLs:
       - the nominated short fiction that appeared in ANALOG is  available
       at http://www.analogsf.com/0107/issue_0107.html
       -  the  nominated  short  fiction  that  appeared  in  ASIMOV'S  is
       available at http://www.asimovs.com
       - David Langford's "Different Kinds of Darkness"  is  available  at
       http://www.sfsite.com/fsf/fiction/dl01.htm
       -   Stanley   Schmidt's   "Generation   Gap"   is   available    at
       http://www.lrcpubs.com/artemismagazine/issue01/gengap1.html
       -   Ted   Chiang's   "Seventy-Two   Letters"   is   available    at
       http://www.tor.com/72ltrs.html

       [-ecl]

       ===================================================================

       2. I was talking about  my  visit  to  Valley  Forge  where  George
       Washington  wintered his troops there the winter and spring of 1777
       and 1778.

       The real hero of the  Valley  Forge  encampment  was  arguably  not
       Washington  but  someone  else  who  was  an  impostor  who  fooled
       Washington  to  get  his  job,  but  who  was  successful   in   it
       nonetheless.    Baron  von  Steuben  (pronounced  STOY-bin)  passed
       himself off as a Lieutenant General from  the  Prussian  Army.   In
       fact  he was only a captain and may not have even been a baron.  He
       nevertheless fooled Washington who, impressed with his credentials,
       had  him appointed acting Inspector General and drillmaster for the
       Continental  Army.   All  consider  he  did  an  excellent  job  of
       disciplining  the troops and is generally credited with turning the
       sloppy  soldiers  into  a  disciplined  and  effective  army.   His
       frequent  temper  tantrums  would  come out as a strange mix of his
       native German.  Nevertheless he was respected  by  the  troops  and
       Washington  made  von  Steuben his Inspector General.  The Prussian
       captain later wrote THE REGULATIONS FOR THE ORDER AND DISCIPLINE OF
       THE  TROOPS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, the official manual of
       military regulations.  But then Washington would have been happy to
       have  just  about  anybody  replace his previous Inspector General.
       And thereby hangs a tale.   It  all  had  to  do  with  the  rarely
       acknowledged  affair  known  as  the  "Conway  Cabal."   Washington
       apparently spent much of his time involved in the intrigues of  the
       Conway Cabal.

       Washington had a great deal of personal appeal to the people in the
       New  Nation,  but John Adams and his cousin Samuel Adams thought he
       was becoming a bit of a demagogue.  They were strongly  considering
       the  advisability of replacing Washington as commander in chief and
       having General Horatio  Gates  replace  him.   Since  the  previous
       autumn  Washington  had  been  embroiled  in an affair known as the
       Conway Cabal.  Washington had been on the defensive  at  Brandywine
       and retreated when some in Congress thought he could have attacked.
       They also thought he squandered real opportunities  at  Germantown.
       So  far  the  Northern  Army  had had greater successes against the
       British and it was claimed that Washington's timidity in  the  face
       of the enemy was to blame.

       Gates had  had  a  major  victory  against  Burgoyne  at  Saratoga.
       Washington  was  a  little  short on major victories at this point.
       Thomas Conway, one of the heroes of Brandywine,  who  had  seen  at
       that  battle  the operations of Washington close up, had a very low
       opinion of Washington.  He also may have been a very ambitious man.
       Conway  told anyone who would listen about the miserable quality of
       Washington's leadership.  Conway went official and  asked  Congress
       to  make  him  a  Major  General.   Washington,  aware of the man's
       opinion, wrote to Congress disparaging Conway  and  threatening  to
       resign if he had to work with the man.

       Conway wrote a letter to General Gates telling  him  just  what  he
       thought  were  the  deficiencies of George Washington.  "Heaven has
       been determined to save our country; or  a  weak  General  and  bad
       Councellors would have ruined it," Conway complained.  He, however,
       left out one deficiency Washington had he may not have  been  aware
       of.   It  seems  under  proper conditions George Washington was not
       above reading other people's mail.  A drunken aide to Gates, a  man
       named  Wilkinson,  told  of the contents of the letter and they got
       back to Washington.  Gates found out that Conway's  private  letter
       to  him  had been copied and given to Washington.  So he protested.
       John Adams found out about all the fighting and bickering and  said
       he  was  "wearied  to  death  with  the  wrangles  between military
       commands high and low."  "They quarrel like  cats  and  dogs."  (Of
       course,  one  is  never sure how literally to take a complaint from
       John Adams.  Adams was himself  a  Mozart  of  contentiousness  and
       caustic overstatement.)

       Washington had asked that an office be created, Inspector  General,
       to  work  with  him  write a training manual and to teach recruits.
       Congress decided they had just the man for  the  position.   Thomas
       Conway  had  been  bucking  for  promotion.   Let  him  and  George
       Washington work together.  On December 29 Conway arrived at  Valley
       Forge.   The  two worked for a while together in icy disdain.  They
       traded oral insults for a while.  But in January  Conway  wrote  an
       insulting  letter to Washington and Washington wrote a cover letter
       and sent it to Congress.  Gates wrote to  Congress  asking  for  an
       investigation on how his letter Conway had been "Stealingly copied"
       and given Washington.  When he found out  his  aide  Wilkinson  had
       been  the  leak  he  challenged  him  to  a duel.  Luckily the aide
       declined.  Gates and Conway next  took  their  cause  to  Congress.
       General  Lafayette  waded  in  saying  that  the  French considered
       Washington and the American Revolution inseparable and any  removal
       of  Washington  from  power  would  be cause for them to reconsider
       their support.  Congress listened to Lafayette, could not afford to
       do  without  French  support,  and  refused  to listen to Gates and
       Conway.  General Gates returned to his troops.  Conway was given  a
       demotion  and  transfer  to the Hudson area where he soon resigned.
       Conway's office as Inspector General was replaced by  von  Steuben.
       [-mrl]

       ===================================================================

       3. SHREK (a film review by Mark R. Leeper):

                 Capsule: An ogre with his donkey sidekick  goes
                 off  on  a  quest  to  rescue a princess from a
                 dragon.   SHREK  is  a  gem  of   writing   and
                 animation.   Like  an out-of-control fire hose,
                 it blasts everyone  and  everything  in  reach,
                 from  Disney  to professional wrestling, but is
                 rarely mean-spirited.  This is a film that will
                 delight  adults as well as children.  Rating: 8
                 (0 to 10), high +2 (-4 to +4)

       SHREK is not so much a fairy tale as a meta-fairy-tale, an ambrosia
       of  fairy  tale  conventions  and scenes poking fun at (among other
       things) the conventions of fairy tales.   It  is  a  lot  like  THE
       PRINCESS  BRIDE  or  Stephen Sondheim's INTO THE WOODS.  Just about
       anything can get a good-natured jab from SHREK.  Based  on  William
       Steig's  book,  the main character is an ogre likable to just about
       anyone but himself.  Called upon to fight a dragon, he  finds  that
       his  real  enemy  is  more  his low self-esteem.  That is harder to
       dispense with than the fearsome beast.  This sounds like  it  could
       be  a  dull  object  lesson but Shrek rings true as a character and
       believable visually on  the  screen.   That  is  because  both  are
       essentially  built  in  the  same  way.  The animation build him up
       starting with an animated skeleton then fleshing out the  character
       putting  digital  flesh  on  the bones.  The character of Shrek was
       built the same, starting on the inside  with  basic  strengths  and
       vulnerabilities  and  building  outward.  The result is a character
       who is three-dimensional in multiple senses.

       Those who believe that films are getting  worse  as  time  goes  by
       would  do  well to concentrate on what is happening to the animated
       film.  Sure not every animated film is great, but see how often  we
       are  now  getting  animated  films  that  seem  better  than  their
       predecessors are.  We are getting films for which not only  is  the
       animation  superior to that of any animated film more than a decade
       old, also frequently the story values are also superior to any of a
       decade  before.   Gone  are  the days of happy twittering bluebirds
       creating  a  new  dress  for  the  falsetto-voiced  heroine   while
       approving bunnies look on.  SHREK, in fact, takes a well-aimed kick
       at the cliche of Walt Disney's bluebirds.

       Shrek (voiced by Michael Myers) is  an  ogre  living  in  a  swamp,
       savoring  his  solitude,  and  frightening  away  all who trespass.
       Nearby Prince Farquaad (John Lithgow) is rounding  up  all  of  the
       magical  creatures in the kingdom.  A talking donkey (Eddie Murphy)
       escapes the prince and hides in the swamp begging  the  hospitality
       of Shrek.  But he need not have bothered escaping.  All the magical
       animals are dumped in the same swamp.  This  much  company  is  too
       much  for  the  ogre.   With the unwelcome companionship of his new
       donkey friend he goes to confront the prince, only to end up  being
       sent  on a mission to rescue one Princess Fiona (Cameron Diaz) from
       the clutches of an angry dragon.

       It has been a while since I have seen a current  film  in  which  a
       male has to go and rescue a female.  I suppose that is a convention
       of the fairy tale.  The script, however, does later make sure  that
       audience  knows she can take care of herself.  This is another film
       that throws martial arts into a context where it does not  seem  to
       belong.   I  suppose that will not bother some viewers in a fantasy
       film,  particularly  because  there   are   so   many   intentional
       anachronisms.   The  plot  falters  only when it takes a digression
       from the fairy tale  plotline  with  a  piece  on  a  misunderstood
       conversation.   That  is  not  really the sort of plot complication
       that one usually finds in fairy tales and it does not quite seem to
       fit.

       Problems remaining are few, but there are a few.  The film makes  a
       real  effort to say that ogres should be tolerated even if they are
       not  attractive,  and  so  they  should.   That  is  a  nice  touch
       particularly  after  Disney  so  often  makes  the  villain ugly or
       obnoxiously manly.  But then the film turns around  and  repeatedly
       makes  fun  of  Farquaad's  short stature.  This is at best a mixed
       signal and verges on hypocrisy.  In addition, a pet peeve  of  mine
       is  the  use  of big stars in animated films for box-office appeal.
       Any number of good unknowns could have taken the voice  roles  just
       as  well  as  stars.   Michael  Myers is almost unrecognizable in a
       thick Scottish brogue in title role.  Recognizing voices seems just
       a distraction in animated films.

       Animation has reached a point where filmmakers do not  have  to  be
       satisfied  with  whatever they can to the screen and that tells the
       story.  Today styles of animation can  be  fit  to  the  character.
       Some  characters intentionally look like mechanical toys and others
       look very alive and fluid with very articulate  facial  expression.
       Like  so  many other animated films in the last few years, this one
       sets an animation standard high for films that  will  follow.   The
       field  of  animation right now is in its phase of flowering.  Right
       now we are having a Golden Age of animated film techniques.   Films
       with  better scripts and better animation than ever before seem not
       to be uncommon.  SHREK is a step forward.  SHREK is a  family  film
       that  parents will probably appreciate more than their children do.
       I rate it an 8 on the 0 to 10 scale and a high +2 on the -4  to  +4
       scale.  [-mrl]

                                          Mark Leeper
                                          HO 1K-644 732-817-5619
                                          mleeper@avaya.com

           The problem with turning 50 is that dying is about 	   the only thing left that people can be surprised
	   that you did so young.
                                          -- Mark Leeper


               THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT ALMOST BLANK